The three laws of performance is just another way to provide advice for the business life. They are good advices and clever ways of seeing the movements of the life in everyday life.
However in my opinion perhaps to much effort was made in creating the way in defining such so called laws. I would prefer call them axioms or yet to define definitions.
Everything is on a change and everything is yet to be defined.
However I guess the goal of the book is to make people think and by doing so get the result the book itself was made.
Change the attitudes of the people or at least change the way people interact with the world and with their ideas or ambitions.
Regards
Dear Rezart,
YanıtlaSilI enjoyed your post, it was fun, I liked your saying “much effort was made in creating the way in defining such so called laws. I would prefer call them axioms”, surely you are an engineer :). Yes, I agree that while trying to search for a better performance using the changes in our language, so being careful, showing a great attention to the words we use, is somehow to change some attitudes in people…
BR,
Erisa
Hello my rational friends :-)
YanıtlaSilI've had similar thoughts about the issue by asking myself why the hell are they calling them laws?
As far as I understood the issue was that those 3 sentences are so general and don't stipulate specific things.
When you have a specific claim it may easily be disproved by other claims coming from different point of views, therefore none of them is a law.
Whereas to say that every claim is relative is a law.
Those 3 sentences resemble the second case in my opinion.
S.K.